ALCTS Collection Evaluation & Assessment Interest Group Meeting
From:
Gabrielle Wiersma <gabrielle.wiersma_at_Colorado.EDU>
***Apologies for cross-posting**
*
*ALCTS Collection Evaluation & Assessment Interest Group ALA Midwinter
Program *
*Date: Sunday, February 1, 2015*
*Time: 1:00-2:30 pm*
*Location: McCormick Place West, MCP-W184a*
*http://alamw15.ala.org/node/25639*
Please join the ALCTS Collection Evaluation and Assessment Interest
Group for three presentations about collection assessment projects to
support data-driven decision making in academic libraries. The meetings
of the Interest Group are open to anyone registered for the conference.
*/Planning for Certain Future Cuts when the Future is Uncertain./*
Beth R. Bernhardt, Assistant Dean for Collection Management and
Scholarly Communications, University of North Carolina Greensboro
Many academic libraries have to make decisions about journal and
database subscriptions before the university releases the upcoming
budget. Often, it is necessary to not only make decisions for the
following fiscal year without a final budget, but to plan ahead and
forecast for an additional year. The Library at the University of North
Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG) formed a Collection Development Team with
members from several invested departments who could divide into
subgroups, analyze data, and return quickly with proposed cuts.
Different scenarios were identified, and a proposed plan for cuts was
created for each potential scenario. This data-driven process provided
CPU, circulation, and other data to assist the team in making decisions.
Timelines were created to allow for ample input from subject liaisons
and departments, including time for departments to react to the proposed
cuts in their areas and to swap out items. This presentation will cover
how UNCG librarians worked as a team and used data to arrive at budget
cut decisions and how we conveyed this information to the UNCG campus.*
*
*/Right Sizing the Print Collection: Collection Assessment Methods for
Ensuring that Shippensburg University Has the Right Books for Its
Users./ *
Ashley N. Esposito, Collection Development and Assessment Librarian,
Shippensburg University
In August 2014, the Associate VP and Dean of Technology and Library
Services assigned the task of creating a right sizing plan for the
print collections that had been weeded and moved to one floor in a
previous and hurried project to make room for renovations on the main
level of Lehman Library. He posed the question: We still have books,
but are they the right books?
This presentation will provide an overview of the various user-based and
collection-based assessment techniques designed to systematicallyand
with great careidentify what books are not right for supporting our
curriculum, what books are that we do not have, and, most importantly,
what formats students in various disciplines are accessing curricular
and research materials. Methods include a survey of faculty and
students, statistical analysis (circulation, interlibrary loan, age),
and collection comparison. In addition, the presenter will discuss how
the library expanded the current collection map, an approval plan for
collection development that connects LC areas to specific department
purchase codes to reflect the requirements of a four-year undergraduate
liberal arts university with additional graduate degree programs, to
include the much-debated Conspectus levels. *
*
*/Assessment methodology: Information gathering for serials review./ *
**Carol Seiler, Account Services Manager, EBSCO Information Services;
Kelli Getz, Assistant Head of Acquisitions, University of Houston.
Each year, the University of Houstons M.D. Anderson Library reviews
serials to make sure the current title list harmonizes to faculty
research areas. Depending on the budget, titles may be added or
canceled. Often titles are both added and cancelled to complement both
the collection and university research objectives. Over the years, the
University of Houston has developed specific methodology to gather and
disseminate vital information needed to make such decisions. They have
determined a wide scope of information needed to best evaluate the
existing collection. The presenters will share what they have learned
is needed to assess serials purchases and will discuss each area and
their adventures in bringing together this information.
Hope to see you in Chicago,
Gabrielle Wiersma
Chair, ALCTS Collection Evaluation and Assessment Interest Group 2014-15
Head of Collection Development
University of Colorado Boulder
303-492-4316
gabrielle.wiersma_at_colorado.edu <mailto:gabrielle.wiersma_at_colorado.edu>
Wenli Gao
Vice-Chair, ALCTS Collection Evaluation and Assessment Interest Group
2014-15
Communication, Sociology, and Anthropology Librarian
University of Houston
713-743-8370
wgao5_at_uh.edu <mailto:wgao5_at_uh.edu>
Received on Sat Jan 10 2015 - 03:09:54 EST