CDL: Cancellation decisions? (response 4)

From: John P. Abbott <abbottjp_at_appstate.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 08:11:00 -0400
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu
CDL: Cancellation decisions?
From:  "Marianne Hebert" <hebertm_at_potsdam.edu>

I concur with the usefulness of overlap analysis tools.  We use Serials 
Solutions routinely when looking at database renewals. You'd be 
surprised at how much duplication there is.  We recently realized that 
our BioOne subscription was only 34% unique, but when we looked to see 
how the unique titles were getting used, they had very good use, and 
individual subscriptions would have cost the same or more. We couldn't 
find any alternate biol databases within our budget. All the EBSCO 
science products we considered were 100% duplicated by Academic Source 
Complete, so we opted to stay with BioOne for another year.

For e-journals, we check every year to see if they are available FT in 
an aggregate database.  Often we decide we can live with embargoes for 
expensive titles and plan to use Inter-library loan as backup.  We also 
look at click through stats: how are patrons using your link resolver, 
to which resources are they linking and how often?

One option to consider is lowering the number of simultaneous users you 
have for some databases.  You can save quite a bit by having a single or 
2-4 users.  Limited users are better than zero.  We are considering to 
do that with Philosopher's Index.  It gets some use, but not a lot.  If 
you have a discovery service like Summons or EDS, limited users won't 
work though.

Good luck!

Marianne
-- 
Marianne Hebert
Librarian
College Libraries
SUNY Potsdam
44 Pierrepont Avenue
Potsdam, NY 13676-2294

hebertm_at_potsdam.edu
(315) 267-3308 voice (315) 267-2744 fax
Web page: http://www2.potsdam.edu/hebertm
Received on Mon Jun 23 2014 - 08:40:05 EDT