{Disarmed} CDL: Knowledge Unlatched question (response 1-3)

From: John P. Abbott <abbottjp_at_appstate.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:37:32 -0500
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu
Original post:

CDL: Knowledge Unlatched question
From: Mary Hollerich<mary.hollerich_at_gmail.com>

Has anyone else on this list been approached about joining Knowledge Unlatched and,
if so, what do you think of it? What factors will influence your decision to join or
not join? I wonder about the program's scalability but am intrigued by it.

Mary
---
Mary A. Hollerich
Editor, Interlending & Document Supply
Asst. Dean for Scholarly Resources and Research Services
Central University Libraries
Southern Methodist University
P.O. Box 750135
Dallas, TX 75275-0135
214-768-4960
mary.hollerich_at_gmail.com

=======
#1

From:
"Swindler, Luke" <luke_swindler_at_unc.edu>

At UNC Chapel Hill we have discussed /Knowledge Unlatched/ as an open 
access model for covering publication costs of e-books that is most akin 
to /SCOAP3/ as another example of libraries collectively covering the 
publisher costs of e-journals.  (For those of you who are not familiar 
with /SCOAP3/ [Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in 
Particle Physics], it is a pilot that re-directs library collections 
funds to cover the publisher costs of producing a sub-set of high energy 
physics journals so that they can be converted to open access and 
thereby become freely available to all.  For more information, go to its 
website at http://scoap3.org/index.html <x-msg://73/%22>.)

For a library that would be buying most of the monographs in /Knowledge 
Unlatched/, the costs of participating would be minimal and could even 
be less than would be spent to purchase these e-books from the 
publishers.  On the other hand, at UNC we are concerned about the access 
platform and whether/if these books will continue to remain available as 
open access resources in perpetuity.

More broadly, in my view the basic requirements for an open access model 
to succeed and become pervasive must include:

  * .Effective and sustainable business model;
  * .Efficient process; and
  * .Scalability.


Insofar as I understand the available options, only Green Open 
Access---author self-archiving---meets all three of these criteria---and 
it does so only because organizations finance institutional repositories 
that host this content. While UNC is participating in /SCOAP3/ and may 
also participate in /Knowledge Unlatched/, the former definitely does 
not meet these three criteria while the latter's ability to do remains 
to be determined.

Luke Swindler

*****************************************************************************
Luke Swindler                                Collections Management Officer
Davis Library    CB #3918 luke_swindler_at_unc.edu 
<mailto:luke_swindler_at_unc.edu>
University of North Carolina                            TEL (919-962-1095)

=======
#2

From:
Tracie Ballock <ballockt_at_duq.edu>

Hi Mary, Here is some information that I just received regarding 
Knowledge Unlached. Hope this helps.

Knowledge Unlatched (KU), an open access initiative for scholarly 
monographs, has recently launched its pilot project using a model that 
has the potential to transform access to knowledge and ideas contained 
in book-length publications. This global initiative places libraries at 
the center of the shift to open access. 13 publishers have placed 28 
titles in the KU pilot project collection. If at least 200 libraries 
worldwide pledge $1,680 (US) in supporting funds to Knowledge Unlatched 
by January 31, 2014, then these 28 titles will become openly accessible 
and the publishers will have recovered their costs to produce these 
titles. If more than 200 libraries pledge support, then the cost for all 
participants will decrease.

The KU pilot project goals include: 1. Showing that scholarly publishers 
will make front-list titles available in open access for a fee paid by a 
community of libraries that covers the cost of producing the title. 2. 
Showing that publishers will work with a coordinating organization (KU) 
to ensure that additional purchases (print or online) by libraries of 
the KU titles are credited as financial contributions towards making 
these open access books available. 3. Showing that it is possible for 
libraries to share the costs of making books available on open access 
licenses through global collaboration. 4. Developing a deeper 
understanding of the barriers for publishers and libraries to 
coordinated approaches to funding open access books.

Tracie J. Ballock, MLS Head of Collection Management Duquesne University 
Gumberg Library 600 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15282 412-396-4560 / 
Fax 412-396-5639

======
#3

From:
Thomas Izbicki <tizbicki_at_rci.rutgers.edu>
Mary,
I had a meeting with them at an ALA meeting, but we were not in a 
position to experiment with the concept.
Tom Izbicki
Rutgers
Received on Fri Dec 06 2013 - 03:03:58 EST