CDL-Survey on aggreagated databases - the results

From: Lynn Sipe <lsipe_at_usc.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:30:27 -0700
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu
>
> From:
> Barbara Fister <fister_at_gac.edu>
>
>
> Apologies for cross-posting.
>
> Long, long ago in a library world far away we posted a link to a 
> survey on
> interdisciplinary aggregated databases that many of you graciously 
> took. Some were interested in results, which have just been published 
> in the July issue of portal: Libraries and the Academy, available to 
> many of you through Project Muse. For those who don't have access, 
> there's a self-archived copy here -
> http://homepages.gac.edu/~fister/aggregateddatabases.pdf
>
> The short version -
> --librarians are very satisfied with these database
> --vendors are listening to librarians and are including more content.
> --from 2005-2006 at 14 undergrad libraries, use declined 10% overall.
> --in all of those libraries combined, 40% of the full text journals 
> included in the database did not have a single article downloaded - 
> not one - at any of the libraries; 4% of titles accounted for half of 
> the downloads. Of the top ten most downloaded publications, only two 
> were scholarly.
>
> Barbara (and Amy Fry and Julie Gilbert, co-authors)
Received on Mon Jul 21 2008 - 11:00:26 EDT