CDL: Preference for Paperbacks? (Response #11)

From: Lynn Sipe <lsipe_at_usc.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:45:21 -0700
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu
From: Kevin Wade Merriman <kmerriman_at_mcneese.edu>

While I don't have policies or research to support it,
I can add anecdotal support to your decision to purchase paperbacks.
My predecessor at our library was big on paperback books...
they are cheaper and they take less linear shelf space.

We have had no problems to distinguish
octovo trade materials as inferior to cloth books.
However, larger quatro paper bound books with glued bindings
don't hold up well, sometimes not even to the first reading...
Paper-bound art books with sewn bindings, however, do very well.
But, mass-market paperbacks I leave for students to buy on their own.

If money is the primary concern,
another alternative is to purchase used books.
Often, when replacing materials, I shop at Alibris
to get cloth bindings for the price of a paperback or cheaper.
Often, this happens when a paperback has been overused
but the title merits replacement... many of the classics, for example.

Kind regards,

Kevin Merriman

McNeese Seal
Collection Management Librarian
McNeese State University Library
P. O. Box 91445
Lake Charles, LA 70609

<mailto:kmerriman_at_mcneese.edu>kmerriman_at_mcneese.edu
Phone: 337 475-5724
Fax: 337 475-5719





a517755.gif
Received on Thu Apr 12 2007 - 01:05:03 EDT