From: Eli Edwards <misseli_at_mac.com>
Libraries and archive digitization projects may benefit greatly if a
newly filed lawsuit succeeds. It could release into the public domain
works published between 1964 and 1977 that did not have their
copyrights renewed. See Kahle v Ashcroft,
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/kahle_v_ashcroft.shtml.
What your library or archive can do to help
Give examples of treasured collections in your library or archives
that that have lots of works published during that time (Jan 1, 1964 -
December 31, 1977) that you will not digitize or that you will not
post online because of copyright. Focus only on works that are not
likely to be commercially exploitable - not major publishing houses.
Example: collection of in-house church newsletters
Bonus Question
Also, is there a crackerjack reference librarian out there who could
help research this question?
How many print works were published during the timeframe 1920-1950? We
have figures for works published during that time that were
registered, noticed and renewed with the Copyright Office. We don't
have figures as to the number of works published that were NOT. A
source showing total number of works published 1920-1950 would help.
Include (and separate if possible) books, newsletters, pamphlets,
brochures etc.
Please send responses to Eli Edwards, misseli_at_mac.com and indicate
your name, institution, collection and how to follow up with you for
more details.
Many thanks,
Eli Edwards, SLIS student -- SJSU
Mary Minow, LibraryLaw.com
(on behalf of Chris Sprigman, attorney litigating the case)
For more info on the lawsuit, see:
"New Lawsuit Spotlights Thousands of Copyright 'Orphans' That Should
Be in the Public Domain" : http://www.fepproject.org/news/kahle.html
(from the Free Expression Policy Project)
"Scholar Sues for Free Online Access to Out-of-Print Books" :
http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v50/i31/31a03401.htm
(from the Chronicle of Higher Ed -- subscriber access only)
Received on Sat May 08 2004 - 03:13:50 EDT