CDL-ARL REPORT FOR CHIEF COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS...ALA, MID-WINTER OFFICERS...ALA, MID-WINTER

From: Lynn F. Sipe <lsipe_at_usc.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:37:00 -0800
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu

Report on
Recent Activities of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL)

Prepared for the Meeting of Chief Collection Development Officers of Large 
Research Libraries
January 19, 2002


ARL E-Metrics Project
The contracted portion of the ARL E-Metrics project is now complete and 
project documents can be found at: 
<http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/index.html>.  Printed versions 
of the project documents will be available as a package early in 2002.  The 
project was conducted by the Information Use Management and Policy 
Institute, Florida State University, under the direction of Charles 
McClure.  Rush Miller (Pittsburgh) and Sherrie Schmidt (Arizona State) 
served as project managers.  For more information, contact Martha 
Kyrillidou at martha_at_arl.org or Julia Blixrud at jblix_at_arl.org.

The project consisted of three phases:  a) knowledge inventory of ARL 
libraries, providing indications of institutions worth considering for best 
practices; b) definition and field testing of a set of measures, with 
recommendations about which measures are most useful and how they can best 
be collected; and c) data collection manual and training materials.  In 
addition, the project investigators also drafted an institutional outcomes 
model that can be applied to research libraries.

One of the outgrowths of the project was the establishment of a working 
group on database vendor statistics.  Project participants and 
investigators worked with 12 database vendors (those with which ARL 
libraries spend the most money) in a field test data to determine if a 
small set of data elements can be defined that are in line with library 
interests that can be generated by the vendors with consistency.  Work with 
the database vendors will continue.

Next steps for this project will include more testing and refinement of the 
measures by project participants, with likely expansion to most or all ARL 
libraries.  Project participants will also be meeting at ALA Midwinter to 
discuss how best to move forward with efforts to relate the use of 
electronic resources to institutional outcomes.

LibQUAL+
  LibQUAL+, a research and development project undertaken by ARL in 
collaboration with Texas A&M University to define and measure library 
service quality across institutions and to create useful quality-assessment 
tools for local planning, can be used to evaluate a library’s 
collections-related services from the user’s point of view.  LibQUAL+ was 
spearheaded by Texas A&M University Libraries, which has been using a 
modified version of the SERVQUAL instrument--a customer survey used widely 
in the private sector--to evaluate their own library services since the 
early 1990s.  The spring 2000 pilot administration of the LibQUAL+ survey 
collected data on 5,000 respondents’ minimum expectations of service, 
desired levels of service, and perceived levels of service in 12 ARL 
libraries.  The second iteration of the survey ran in 43 libraries (35 of 
which are ARL members) in spring 2001 with 34,000 individuals 
responding.  The LibQUAL+ homepage is at http://www.libqual.org/.

In fall 2000, ARL was awarded a $498,368 grant from the U.S. Department of 
Education’s Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE) to 
help defray the cost of further developing the LibQUAL+ tool and scaling up 
its application to the full spectrum of libraries in the higher education 
community.  Over 170 libraries, including the OhioLINK consortium and 
approximately 40 members of The Association of Academic Health Sciences 
Libraries, will be participating in the spring 2002 administration of the 
survey.  Reports on LibQUAL+ were presented at the 4th Northumbria 
International Conference, 12-16 August, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
http://www.arl.org/stats/north/, and the Library Research Seminar II, 2-3 
November, College Park, Maryland http://www.dpo.uab.edu/~folive/LRSII/. As 
the LibQUAL+ dataset becomes richer, those libraries whose users rate 
collections-related services below minimum expectations can look to their 
cohorts who excel in that area for models for improvement.

A proposal to assess service quality in digital libraries resulted in a 
grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to ARL and Texas A&M of 
$245,737 over a three-year period to adapt the LibQUAL+ instrument for use 
in the Science, Math, Engineering and Technology Education Digital Library 
community.

Institutions interested in participating in future LibQUAL+  projects or 
for those interested in more details of the project should contact 
Consuella Askew Waller at consuella_at_arl.org.

Learning Outcomes
The Learning Outcomes Project within the ARL New Measures Initiative is 
intended to help identify measures that libraries can use to demonstrate 
their contribution to campus learning outcomes.  A Working Group was 
established in August.  At their meeting in October, the Learning Outcomes 
Working Group reported on data gathering efforts for institutions, 
accrediting agencies, and other organizations engaged in outcomes 
assessment and discussed learning outcomes assessment activities conducted 
on research library campuses.  The group decided to focus on the following 
activities:  a) identifying commonly used learning outcomes from working 
group campuses, particularly those used for general education requirements, 
and determine if an instrument could be developed to be used across 
libraries to assess those outcomes; b) identify potential national student 
surveys to which specific library questions could be added and construct 
questions for testing at the next survey cycle; and c) develop plans for 
offering workshops that address both the process for becoming engaged in 
campus learning outcomes assessment activities as well the specific skills 
needed to work with faculty on developing learning outcomes for research 
universities.  The Working Group will meet at ALA Midwinter.  For more 
information, contact Julia Blixrud <jblix_at_arl.org>.

ARL Statistics Publications Published
ARL Statistics 1999-2000 (October) document the continued increase in costs 
for the purchase of materials and the increased demand for library user 
education and interlibrary borrowing.  Available on the web:
<http://www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/00pub/00arlstat.pdf> 
<http://www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/mrstat.html>

ARL Supplementary Statistics 1999-2000 (October) provides quantitative data 
on how much individual ARL member libraries spend on a variety of 
electronic resources. Highlights from this year's data show that overall 
expenditures have increased on average from an estimated 3.6% of library 
materials budget in 1992-93 to 12.9% in 1999-2000.  Available on the web: 
<http://www.arl.org/stats/sup/sup00.pdf>.

ARL/OCLC Strategic Issues Forum
More than 75 library leaders have registered for FUTURE LIBRARY 
ARCHITECTURE:  CONCEPTION, DESIGN, AND THE USE OF LIBRARY SPACE, the 3rd 
ARL/OCLC  Strategic Issues Forum.  Scheduled for February 15-17, 2002 at 
the Golden Nugget Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, the Forum provides 
thought-provoking presentations by colleagues and professional leaders 
matched with audience discussion and debate.

Digital technologies, economic pressures, and shifting user needs and 
expectations are among the forces that are dramatically reshaping libraries 
today. Such compelling forces affect every dimension of library operations 
and require a reconsideration of existing and planned library space along 
many dimensions.  The goals of this year's Strategic Issues Forum are:  (1) 
to engage library leaders in an exploration of important issues affecting 
the future development of library space, and (2) to help prepare them to 
envision and make the case for innovative library spaces that are directly 
responsive to user needs and interests on their campuses.

Speakers include:  Stephen Johnson, Principal and David Hart, Senior 
Associate, of Hardy, Holzman Pfeiffer Associates; George H. Davis, Sr. Vice 
President for Academic Affairs and Provost, University of Arizona;
and Gene Levy, Provost, Rice University.

Forum information, including a full speaker list and agenda, can be found 
at: <http://www.oclc.org/institute/events/lv/index.htm>.  Registration 
information is at:
http://www.oclc.org/institute/registration/3rd_SIF_oireg.htm.
For further information, contact Julia Blixrud <jblix_at_arl.org>.



ARL and University of Michigan Library Sponsor Conference on Preservation
On March 7-8, 2002, ARL and the University of Michigan Library will present 
Redefining Preservation, Shaping New Solutions, Forging New Partnerships, a 
conference aimed at identifying, exploring, and examining current and 
evolving preservation issues confronting academic libraries and 
institutions.  The conference is designed for library
directors, assistant/associate directors, preservation administrators, and 
members of the vendor community that service library preservation 
needs.  The event will be held in Ann Arbor.  Early bird registration 
through Feb. 1 is $145.  Information on the conference program and 
registration details can be found at
http://www.lib.umich.edu/conferences/preservation/.

Knight Roundtable Report Released
The final report of the Knight Higher Education Roundtable on scholarly 
publishing in the humanities and social sciences was published in late 
December.  The roundtable, jointly sponsored by ARL, NHA, and the Knight
Collaborative, with funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities, 
was held in March 2001 to discuss the future of dissemination of scholarly 
findings in the humanities and social sciences.  Participants in the 
roundtable, which included faculty, administrators, scholarly society 
executives, scholarly publishers, and librarians, concluded that to attract 
funds to support scholarly exploration and publication in these 
disciplines, scholars need to
explore more intensively digital publication as a means to cultivate a 
broader base of support.  Recognizing that scholars need assurances that 
their investment in electronic publishing will count for promotion and 
tenure, the participants also recommended that universities establish 
policies that establish peer-reviewed electronic publications as comparable 
to peer-reviewed print publications in the review process. Participants 
also recommended that active and continuing partnerships among the 
stakeholders are necessary to provide the infrastructure, expertise, and 
financial resources to help ensure the viability of electronic 
publishing.  Entitled "Op. Cit.," the essay is published as the December 
2001 issue of Policy Perspectives and can be found online
at <http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/pubs/>.  Copies will be sent to ARL member 
libraries later in January.

International Scholarly Communications Alliance
ARL joins sister organizations around the globe as an initial member of the 
International Scholarly Communications Alliance (ISCA).  The ISCA is an 
action-oriented global network that will collaborate with scholars and 
publishers to establish equitable access to scholarly and research 
publications.  The Alliance is being formed by research library 
organizations around the world to facilitate development of global 
solutions to a global problem in scholarly communication.  The creation of 
such an organization was first proposed by the Consortium of University 
Research Libraries, U.K. (CURL).  Meetings were held in Washington in 
August and October with interested organizations.  In addition to ARL and 
CURL, the Association of Japanese National University Libraries (ANUL), the 
Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL), the Committee of New 
Zealand Librarians (CONZUL), the
Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL), and the Ligue des 
Bibliotheques Europeennes de Recherche (LIBER) have signed on.  A formal 
announcement will be made in early January.  Paul Ayris, Director of 
Libraries at the University College London, is the Interim Secretary of the 
group.

IMLS Funds Preservation Survey Project
We are pleased to report that the IMLS has funded a joint CLIR, ARL, 
University Libraries Group, and Regional Alliance for Preservation project 
to research and document current conditions and challenges in preservation 
programs in American college and research libraries.  The first phase of 
the project will focus on collecting quantitative data on preservation and 
digitizing activities, and institutional context for the non-ARL libraries 
represented in the group.  The ARL Preservation Statistics survey and other 
instruments will serve as the basis for this inquiry.  The second phase of 
the project is intended to document preservation needs and will be 
undertaken through the development of case studies to obtain qualitative 
data.  Site visits to 20 representative institutions (planned for late 
spring and summer 2002) from all of the participating libraries will be 
conducted.  The results
of the study will document current conditions and provide the knowledge 
base for the partners to use in developing strategic initiatives to address 
preservation needs in an increasingly complex and changing 
environment.  IMLS awarded CLIR, on behalf of the partners, a National 
Leadership Grant for Libraries in Research & Demonstration of 
$71,930.  Anne Kenney, CLIR and Cornell, is the project director, and 
Deirdre Stam is the project consultant.  ARL staff Martha Kyrillidou and 
Mary Case are providing support for the project.  In addition, Mary Case 
and Nancy
Gwinn, Chair of ARL's Preservation Committee, serve on the project’s 
Advisory Committee.

Special Collections:  An ARL Agenda
The June 2001 conference at Brown University, “Building on 
Strength;  Developing an ARL Agenda for Special Collections,” brought 
together library directors and special collections librarians in a 
successful working symposium.  The resulting “action agenda” was discussed 
in detail at the October 2001 ARL membership meeting, at sessions of the 
Research Collections Committee and the Committee on Access as well as at a 
special small-group breakout session.  Since then, a new Special 
Collections Task Force has been established to take the next steps toward 
implementing the recommendations that emerged from the Brown 
symposium.  For more information, see: 
http://www.arl.org/collect/spcoll/index.html.

AAU/ARL Global Resources Program
The Advisory Board of the Global Resources Program is meeting at ARL 
headquarters on January 14, 2002 to consider the Program’s achievements and 
next steps, including funding options for the future.  All seven of the 
regional projects have continued to make progress towards the original 
goals of the Program, to enhance access to international materials through 
new uses of technology and collaboration.

The African Newspaper Union List Project (AFRINUL) is a multi-institutional 
project to produce and maintain and electronic union list of sub-Saharan 
African newspapers.  A joint initiative of the Africana Librarians Council 
(ALC) of the African Studies Association (ASA), and the Cooperative 
Africana Microform Project (CAMP) of CRL, AFRINUL also complements CRL’s 
ICON project.  AFRINUL currently has 15 participating libraries.  For more 
information, see http://wwwcrl.uchicago.edu/info/camp/afrinul.htm.

The German Resources Project carries out its work through four working 
groups:  collection development,  document delivery, digital libraries, and 
bibliographic control, and currently has over 46 member 
libraries.  Highlights of Project achievements include:

·       A proposal to enable Project libraries to subscribe corporately to 
a list of German database through xiplois.net has been concluded.  This 
online reference service was announced in December 2001 and will be 
launched early in 2002.  See 
http://www.library.northwestern.edu/grp/xipolisoffer.html.
·       Negotiations are underway to provide access for Project 
participants to USMARC cataloging records for items in the Bibliothek der 
deutschen Literatur (microfiche set published by G. K. Saur) at a 
substantially discounted price.
·       The records for 78,000 volumes of the library of the former 
Paedagogische Hochschule, Erfurst, are available as an EndNote database for 
Project members to examine in anticipation of negotiating exchanges for 
these materials.
·       Twenty-seven subject areas have now been included in the Project’s 
Partnerships program.  These are working personal linkages between 
specialists in German and North America, beyond Germanistik extending to 
such      f ields as geography, mathematics, art, Judaica, South Asian 
studies, Latin American studies, and American studies.
·       The promotion and refinement of the GBVdirekt/North America 
document delivery service for North American libraries has been a Project 
focus.  Over 25 institutions now participate and the number is increasing.

The Japan Journal Access Project has focused on interlibrary loan (ILL) and 
document delivery (DD) issues during the past six months.  The Association 
of National University Libraries (ANUL) project was successfully concluded 
in February 2001 with the Conference on Improvement of Academic Information 
Access between the U.S. and Japan.  Japanese and American delegates agreed 
to resume "regular ILL" until NII completed implementation of the ISO ILL 
Protocol, the international standard that permits ILL/DD requests to be 
exchanged between different systems.  NII indicated that they would like to 
use the ILL Protocol with the OCLC ILL system.  After a meeting with NII 
and OCLC staff in March, the two organizations have been exchanging test 
messages this fall.

On December 15, 2001 Sachie Noguchi and Mary Jackson represented the Japan 
Project and NCC at a meeting held at the University of Tokyo General 
Library.   The aim of the meeting was to establish the framework for the 
next phase of global ILL/DD exchange.  ANUL and NII are aggressively moving 
toward the realization a Global ILL Framework (GIF) and their efforts will 
be actively supported by the Japan Project.  Over the next six months, we 
can expect to see expanded exchange of ILL requests between Japanese and 
North American libraries.

The Latin Americanist Research Resources Project is in the final year of a 
three-year grant of over $400,000 from the U. S. Department of Education’s 
program “Technological Innovation and Cooperation for Foreign Information 
Access” (TICFIA), focused on expanding the Latin American partnerships 
program.  Through this program, libraries in Bolivia, Guatemala, Puerto 
Rico, the West Indies, and Argentina have begun contributing to the table 
of contents database (LAPTOC).  In November, another TICFIA proposal was 
submitted, addressing the need for improved control of and access to Latin 
America’s “grey literature,” through the Latin American Open Archives 
Portal. The project has 50 members.

The Slavic Document Delivery Project.  In its start-up stage, this 
project’s goal is to create a mutually beneficial document delivery system 
between libraries in Slavic countries and in North America.  Initially, six 
libraries in East Central Europe and the countries of the former Soviet 
Union will participate and will be provided with Ariel for a one-year trial 
period, courtesy of RLG.  The goal of project organizer Brad Schaffner 
(University of Kansas) is to have six different countries and languages 
represented.

The Digital South Asia Library (DSAL).  DSAL and the closely related 
Digital Dictionaries of South Asia (DDSA) project both originated with the 
support of the Global Resources Program.  Since then, the projects have 
attracted funding from the U. S. Department of Education ($595,000 for DSAL 
and $444,031 for DDSA) to expand web resources.  Together, the projects 
have digitized books and journals, dictionaries, bibliographies, images, 
statistics, and maps.

The Southeast Asia Indexing Project/Thai Journal Index.  This project 
consists of two parts:  a project based at Cornell University Library to 
enhance the range of materials represented in the Bibliography of Asian 
Studies (BAS) and a project based at the University of Washington to 
provide access to Thai journals, using scanned images of part of the 
original text and transliterated metadata.  Both are cooperative projects 
sponsored by the committee on Research Materials on Southeast Asia 
(CORMOSEA), a subcommittee of the Association of Asian Studies.
Received on Thu Jan 31 2002 - 10:37:16 EST