CDL: (2 Responses) ScienceDirect, missing content.

From: John P. Abbott <AbbottJP_at_conrad.appstate.edu>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 15:17:29 -0400
To: colldv-l_at_usc.edu
Responses to the following posting:

From:    Kenneth Murr <krmrr_at_CLEMSON.EDU>
>
>In August, I had a request from our Resource Sharing staff to help with a
>citation to CATALYST TODAY.  The citation referred to an article starting
>on page 415 of vol 28, n. 4.  Since we subscribe to ScienceDirect, they
>had tried to get the article from there but the online version only went up
>to page 389.  I verified the article using Web of Science and a kind
>reference librarian from VA Tech went to the shelf and verified that the
>article really did exist in print  while I waited on the telephone.
>
>We reported the error to Science Direct and received, at least to me, very
>disturbing news:  "As of today we have under 2% of our
>journal content missing. "  My first thought was "Oh my, .02% would be bad,
>this is terrible."  Some of my colleagues here at Clemson were unconcerned
>and assured me that it was not that bad.  After all, we have had missing
>issues, torn out pages, etc. before.  I responded that yes, but we had
>procedures to deal with such things.  Our acquisitions system automatically
>notifies us if issues are late, we order individual issues, interlibrary
>loan missing pages, etc.  What do we do if the publisher has errors? How
>can I know as I look at the online journal which stops at page 389 that
>there are really 6 more articles unlisted.   My friends re-assured me that
>Elsevier would correct the errors just as they said they would in their
>response to us.  Well, it's been a month and with no change.  During this
>time, patrons have reported other missing articles and even missing issues.
>
>This has forced me to reconsider my support for "going all
>electronic".  Our Libraries' goal is to go as completely electronic as
>possible and I had supported that very strongly.
>
>Have any of you, noticed problems with electronic sources?
>
>Thanks
>
>Kenneth R. Murr
>Clemson University Libraries
>Clemson, SC  29634

==#1
From: clenox <clenox_at_jcu.edu>
  
My view is that the publishers need to have and follow procedures for fixing 
the errors, just as libraries always followed procedures to replace missing 
articles, etc.  It is a nuisance for them, but with our increasing dependence 
in electronic sources, they need to follow through.  I'd say we all need to 
continue to inform them and insist on the importance.

Cindy Lenox
John Carroll University

==#2
From: "Linwood DeLong" <linwood.delong_at_uwinnipeg.ca>

 Yes, we have had several.  I remember an instance in which a journal 
article had been scanned in with a totally incorrect title, because the 
background for part of the title  was green, and the scanner didn't 
read the title.  Yesterday I was working with a student who was using 
an e-version of a journal article in which all of the footnotes had
been stripped off.   The footnote numbers were in the text, but they 
didn't lead to anything.  Whole articles, especially book reviews,  are 
suppressed in some cases, if  the aggregator is not given permission by 
the journal publisher to include them.   I remember phoning a company 
and discovering that they had had difficulty s canning a  particular 
issue, and that this issue wouldn't be up for a while.
  
 I have no idea how these things can be systematically checked, but the 
library community has to be vigilant, because there are all too many 
people who, with a sweep of the hand, state that "it's all there on 
the Internet".
  
 Linwood DeLong
 University of Winnipeg Library
  
 Linwood DeLong
 Collections Coordinator
 University of Winnipeg Library
 515 Portage Ave.
 Winnipeg, MB
 Canada R3B 2E9
Received on Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:21:47 EDT