CDL:(Responses) Cdroms continued usefulness

From: John P. Abbott <abbottjp_at_conrad.appstate.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:16:58 -0400
To: Colldv-l <COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu>
[These posts are in response to the following question.]

I am trying to gather information on the 
importance of cd-roms in library collections.  
With the advent of the Internet and the move to dvd 
technology, do you still feel that cd-roms are worth
acquiring? Also, what types of information 
do you feel is better when presented on cd-rom 
than on the Internet.  Any insights would be
helpful.  I work in a small library in Lyndonville, 
Vermont.  
 
 Thank you. Cheryl McMahon
 
======================
#1

From:  John Abbott <abbottjp_at_appstate.edu>

Functionality sometimes varies between the cdrom
product and the web product, perhaps because the
cdrom db is installed in an environment that it 'knows'
and has more local control than in the web application.
With the ATLA database, our phil/rel faculty have
discovered the cdrom version has better Biblical verse 
searching power than any of the web implementations.  
My memory is that Current Contents on disc has reprint 
request printing capabilities that are not available 
on the web version.  

=======================
#2

From: Anthony W Ferguson <ferguson_at_columbia.edu>

Assuming that the price of web access and cdrom 
were the same, we would go for the web since our 
users would have much  broader accesss from
wherever they are at.  If web access is more 
expensive and the user community is small, I 
would favor cdroms.  If the user community is
large, I would favor web acces.  tony
Received on Thu Jul 27 2000 - 06:17:44 EDT