CDL: (Response-2) Coll. Analysis

From: John P. Abbott <abbottjp_at_conrad.appstate.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 18:18:50 -0400
To: Colldv-l <COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu>
[Further responses to the posting below and its summary
answer:

Could anyone please tell me if you have ever developed 
a collection analysis for your library? If so, 
how did you get started?

Thanks in advance
Thedis Washington]
=============================================

From:   Dianne Cook <cookdc_at_post.queensu.ca>

These are all interesting approaches, and 
probably precisely what the original query 
was hoping for.

However, I cannot help but express my increasing 
concern about:
 
a) how we evaluate collections in future, when
more of our materials are electronic 

When we acquire electronic packages we 
know which titlesare included at the outset.  
However, publishers keep adding (and sometimes 
deleting) titles with little or no input 
(that I have yet seen) from their clients. Changes 
could result, e.g. from merger and separation 
agreements between publishers.  If your library 
has a number of electronic packages, just 
keeping up with what titles you are providing 
users becomes a challenge.

If counting volumes in LC classes is used as 
a comparator, it will be necessary to remember 
that some libraries may not classify serials, 
and may not create item records for serial volumes 
that do not circulate.  Furthermore, if we
move from volumes on the shelf to electronic 
subscriptions, there will be no volume counts 
for these, yet we may be providing more comprehensive 
collections than ever before. 

Placing one subscription that includes 800 serial 
titles may result in collection growth that outstrips 
local cataloguing capability (i.e.: backlogs may grow).  
In some cases, a library's subscription list may be 
presented as a web page rather than catalogued records.  

And electronic books are on the horizon.

b) how we measure the effectiveness of collection
development in our institution in terms of what
we need on the shelves versus what we can obtain
quickly as it is needed.  If we can achieve 
document-delivery databases that allow users to 
browse electronic issues of journals and order 
articles of interest (with cost-effective, fast 
delivery) counting volumes on the shelf may provide 
little information regarding the value of our library 
to our users.
Received on Wed Jul 26 2000 - 15:19:29 EDT