no.2563- Agenda, Chief Collection Development DG]

From: John Abbott <abbottjp_at_conrad.appstate.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 14:14:56 -0500
To: Colldv-l <COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu>
From Steve Bosch <sbosch_at_bird.library.arizona.edu>

  ALCTS CMDS Chief Collection Development Officers of Large Research
                  Libraries Discussion Group
 
 AGENDA: ALA Midwinter Meeting,  San Antonio, TX,
 Saturday, January 15, 2000
 8:30-11:30 a.m. Holiday Inn Riverwalk Tarantella 2-4
 
 (REMEMBER TO CHECK THE PROGRAM FOR LAST MINUTE ROOM CHANGES!)
 
 Announcements and Introductions
         a. Introductions
         b. Approval of Minutes of 1999 Annual Meeting
         c. Early English Books Project (Mark Sandler)
         d. Other Announcements
 
 1. Report on the Nominating Committee (Steve Bosch)
 
 2. Discussion of Reports submitted by ARL, CRL, and LC prior to the
 meeting
 
 3. Membership Review: Criteria for Membership and Process for Notifying
 Members (Lou Pitschmann)
 
 4.  Electronic Books. (Both these items were discussed at Annual but it
 was suggested they be revisited since discussion had to be cut-off)
 
 a. E-Texts in the Humanities. The increasing availability of e-resources
 in the humanities appears to be greater than users' demand. Are publishers
 ahead of consumers' needs? Do training programs and/or e-text centers
 sufficiently increase demand for and use of these resources to justify
 greater investment in e-texts for the humanities at this time
 
 b. E-Books. E-books are proliferating (inter alia, netLibrary.com). How
 are libraries incorporating these into their collections? What is known
 thus far about use of e-books provided by libraries? What are the costs
 and costs per use?
 
 5. Foreign Language STM Publications. As English continues to grow as the
 "language of preference" for scholarly communication, is there a need for
 foreign-language STM publications in our collections? Which libraries in
 North America are collecting these materials? (CRL? LC? NLM? NAL?) Is
 there a growing distributed national collection in academic libraries?
 What are the demands for these titles by users? Do these materials
 represent a serious gap in North American collections?
 
 6. Subject Specialists' Homepages. A growing number of collection
 development staff have created homepages describing local collections and
 with links to other resources. To what extent are these pages part of a
 larger coordinated CDM program? What criteria are used in their creation?
 Who reviews and/or approves content, format, etc.? (Bill Schenck)
 
 7. Consortia and the Purchase/Licensing of Electronic Resources: Benefits
 and Drawbacks. Through consortial arrangements we have been able to
 consolidate purchasing power realizing some savings, improve licensing
 terms, develop new forms of collection sharing; but to what extent have we
 lost control and focus in collection development through the following:
 (a) top-down decision making in state-wide consortia without much regard
 to local need; (b)purchases of packages that cannot be individualized to
 local needs; (c) complicated and remote acquisition procedures, at times
 with a diminished relationship with vendors. (Bob Sewell)
 
 8. Update on meeting with ARL concerning "The Changing Nature of
 Collection Management in Research Libraries" and continued discussion.
 (Gay Dannelly, et al)
 
 9. Report on CRL's Creating New Strategies For Cooperative Collection
 Development Seminar, and continued discussion on Cooperative Collection
 Development of Print Formats: Costs and Savings. (Susan Rabe et al)
 
 With few exceptions (e.g., membership in CRL), research libraries appear
 not to have embraced cooperative collection development on a large scale.
 Can large research libraries rely on cooperative collection development in
 fields that are not just minor areas of interest or completely out of
 scope? Are there examples, of successful large-scale cooperative projects
 to acquire, process, and maintain print collections on a collaborative
 basis? Can any members of this group cites examples and provide
 information on the what contributed to the success of the cooperative
 effort. Are there examples of significant savings? Satisfactory access to
 collections? Are there examples of coordinated approval plan profiles?
 
 *****************************************************************
 
 Notes and membership list are attached.
 
 Stephen Bosch
 Finance & Admin Services
 University of Arizona Library
 1510 E. University
 Tucson, AZ
 
 520-621-6452
 520-621-9733 fax
Received on Fri Jan 07 2000 - 11:35:26 EST