no.1894-USE STUDIES QUERY (Response #2)

From: Lynn F. Sipe <lsipe_at_usc.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 09:53:02 -0800
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu
[Original posting on this topic appeared in COLLDV-L no. 1872 and was
reproduced with Response #1 in COLLDV-L no. 1886.]

(2) From: Nan Butkovich <njb_at_psulias.psu.edu>

You might want to take a look at the Pittsburgh Survey from the late
1970's. It's been a couple of years since I read the report, and I don't
recall if they addressed this question in their conclusions or not.
However, it was a big longitudinal study of monographs which lasted seven
years. It was published as

Kent, Allen, et. al.  1979.  Use of library materials: the University of
Pittsburgh study.  New York: Marcel Dekker.)

As I recall, the study generated quite a bit of controversy in the library
literature of the time.

I don't think that I could justify using this method with my collection,
because monographs are such a small portion of the collection in this
library.  Instead, I prefer to use reshelving data augmented by local
citation data to measure journal use.  I find that I get a lot fewer
complaints from the library users when I use this combination.  I've
described what I do below.

To get journal use data, I have the shelvers record the year and call
numbers of bound volumes that are to be reshelved.  This information is
then entered into an EXCEL file.  I can then create a spreadsheet with year
date of volume used on the x-axis and call number and year used on the
y-axis.  The software automatically gives me total use by year of use,
total use by volume year, and total use by call number.  It's pretty simple
and reasonably fast.

A couple of years ago, I did a detailed study of the entire journal
collection as far back as we had holdings at this location, and ran the
study for 15 months.  That gave me a baseline.  (Those were the
pre-electronic journal days.)  We are now in the eighth month of a new
study which is just focusing on the volumes published since 1985.  (The
older volumes that aren't used have long since gone to remote storage.)

I also get the raw use data for the main subject areas in my collection
from the remote storage facilities and run them through a similar EXCEL
program.  This helps me verify that there aren't any changes in use in the
material that I'm sending to storage.

I also like to look at Science Citation Index each year.  By limiting the
search to the local zip code, I can get a ranked list of journal titles
arranged alphabetically by title and including the rank and the number of
citations.  It's not clean data; I have to watch out for variations in the
titles, but it's a good measure of local use.

Nan Butkovich
Head, Physical Sciences Library		Tel.: 814/865-3716
230 Davey Laboratory				Fax.: 814/865-2565
Penn State University			E-mail: njb_at_psulias.psu.edu  or
University Park, PA  16802-6301		njb2_at_psu.edu
Received on Mon Nov 16 1998 - 09:48:06 EST