no.1423-ALA, SAN FRANCISCO, MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT #10

From: Lynn Sipe <lsipe_at_calvin.usc.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 12:42:47 -0700
To: COLLDV-L_at_usc.edu
From: Steve Bosch <sbosch_at_bird.library.arizona.edu>

ANNOUNCEMENT: Saturday, June 28th 11:30-12:30 at the Moscone Center, Room
220 a hearing for a proposed "Guide to User's Needs Assessment for
Collection Development" will be held. As part of the Association for Library
Collection and Technical Services Collection Management Development
Section's Collection Development Guide Series, this guide will provide
information on how to conduct assessments of library user's information
needs for collection development purposes. The hearing is sponsored by ALCTS
CMDS Collection Development Issues for the Practioner Committee. Anyone who
would like to provide feedback on this guide is urged to attend or to
contact any of the authors.

  DRAFT OUTLINE TO THE GUIDE TO USER'S NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR COLLECTION
                               DEVELOPMENT

          ALA ALCTS COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PRACTITIONER
                           DRAFT - JUNE, 1997

                              DORA BIBLARZ
               ASSOCIATE DEAN - TQS/CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
                        ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

                               STEVE BOSCH
                      INFORMATION ACCESS LIBRARIAN
                          UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

                              CHRIS SUGNET
                      SCIENCE-ENGINEERING LIBRARIAN
                          UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
Draft outline
I. Why do needs assessment,  defining the value of user assessments, the
   "theory" concerning user needs assessment
   A. Competition for resources forces shift in focus to include user needs
      1. Public organizations are judged by how well they  meet the needs of
         their stakeholder with a focus on how useful this mission is to the
         public  and how well the organization achieves their mission
      2. Resources are increasingly being allocated based on user
      satisfaction
      3. Accountability and strategic impact have to be concerns for public
         institutions - expenditures must be justified as being cost
         effective and important
      4. We are the library, we are good, we are important - so we get
         funded - this is no longer a valid assumption
      5. Private entrepreneurs will compete with public organizations to
         provide services - all markets are open - there are no sacred cows
      6. Users will use those information services that are the most
         convenient  for them. If AOL and Compuserve offer indexes+ direct
         links to information users may go there for information services.
         Educational software providers are becoming more active in course-
         pack publishing
      7. Some academic users that were formerly taken for granted, as
         Library services were "indispensable" (e.g., College of Extended
         Education), can now opt for other options like coursepacs from copy
         shops or other providers. The CEE is one example of the more
         entrepreneurial aspects of the higher education scene of today and
         the next 5-10 years.
   B. When to undertake needs assessment projects
      1. New programs / reallocation to meet new demands or the strategic
         planning process
      2. Program / budget cuts
      3. Changes in user base
      4. As part of regular budgeting process
      5. As part of problem solving process
      6. To help manage user expectations
      7. Writing/updating CD policy statements
      8. Before entering cooperative agreements or joining consortia
   C. Benefits
      1. Maximizes the potential that programs, collections, and services
         serve user needs
      2. Provides quantifiable context for allocation of resources and
         program planning, and to provide justification for new resource
         requests
      3. Insures that resources are supporting users'  objectives
      4. Supports strategy of combining access and ownership in certain
         disciplines to provide the best service
   D. Cost/benefits issues
      1. Dependent upon scope, assessment projects can require significant
         resources in terms of staff time, materials (forms, etc.), or costs
         for consultants
      2. The expected outcomes / learnings of the project need to be
         evaluated in terms of the cost of the doing the assessment  and
         (possibly) fine tune the assessment to correspond with the expected
         outcomes/learnings" My point is that the assessment can be
         expensive but still worth doing, so it may be re-thought to cut
         some costs or more funding can be allocated to it since the outcome
         is central to whatever else is going on

II.   Types of assessment data that may be useful and how to gather and use
      the data
   A. Direct user Input - (surveys)
      1. User information needs / use surveys
         a. Exploratory data collection
            (1).  Focus groups
            (2).  Critical incident interviews
         b. Direct mailing
         c. Online forms
         d. Random timed surveys
      2. User "satisfaction" surveys
   B. Surrogate data, data that describes current conditions
      1. College/school enrollment data
         a. Number of graduates/undergraduates
         b. Degrees awarded
         c. Number of, and distribution of credit hours
      2. Demographic analysis of other types of user populations including
         community profiles for public libraries
      3. Faculty/staff demographics
      4. Course offerings
      5. Circulation/use  statistics
         a. Analyze circulation patterns of monographic/serial collections
         b. Stats on patron requests for holds
         c. In-house use statistics for both serials/monos
         d. Photocopy activity
         e. Electronic data-base gatecounts (data on how electronic
            resources are used)
         f. Gatecounts of patrons entering buildings
      6. Collection statistics, evaluation of collection:
         a. Number of titles/volumes
         b. Age
         c. Condition
         d. Distribution of multiple copies in the collection, frequency of
            use (or lack of it).
      7. Interlibrary loan and document delivery statistics.
      8. Library/parent organization strategic plans
      9. Consortial agreements
      10.   Price indices, costs data
      11.   Analysis of organizations' external environment
         a. Parent organization
         b. Political , municipal / legislative environment
      12.   Materials Budget
   C. Citation studies
      1. ISI Impact factor / journal halflife analysis
      2. Journal studies
      3. Mono studies
   D. Other library activities
      1. Reference collection statistics and use statistics
         a. Size,  age of collections
         b. Does it answer patrons questions
      2. Instruction

III. Pointers and pitfalls
   A. Unmet needs, id user groups that aren't being served, that are under-
      served, under-represented including groups that are not "formally
      recognized".  These may include: diploma mills, charter schools,
      private providers of ILL/doc del, and who knows how many other
      information-needy constituencies. How do these groups impact services
      and how should they impact assessments and service deign.
   B. The "easy data is the right data"  syndrome can lead to false data
      models
   C. Data that describes inputs and data that describes outputs can be
      easily confused

IV.   Scenarios
   A. Possible scenario for needs assessment for new program
   B. Possible scenario for needs assessment for reallocation of budget
   C. Possible scenario for needs assessment for cooperative resource
      sharing project

V.    Suggestions for further information including references to published
      works, unpublished examples, case studies, and web pages/internet
      resources

VI.   Glossary
Received on Sat Jun 14 1997 - 12:42:40 EDT