Spam detection software, running on the system "avery.infomotions.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see eric_morgan_at_infomotions.com for details. Content preview: I wrote my thesis on OCLC's intellectual property interest. If anyone is interested in a deeper dive on this topic, I have attached it. I don't think OCLC has as much of an IP interest as they think they do. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 0.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [66.175.211.245 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 FROM_LOCAL_HEX From: localpart has long hexadecimal sequence 0.7 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From: starts with several numbers 3.0 SINGLE_HEADER_3K A single header contains 3K-4K characters -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
attached mail follows:
I wrote my thesis on OCLC's intellectual property interest. If anyone is interested in a deeper dive on this topic, I have attached it. I don't think OCLC has as much of an IP interest as they think they do.
On Monday, April 26, 2021, 11:24:57 AM CDT, Eric Hellman <eric_at_hellman.net> wrote:
I doubt that the Oracle v. Google case has any effect on the status of DDC especially since "AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION V. DELTA DENTAL PLANS ASSOCIATION", though not a SCOTUS case is a much more relevant precedent.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1233610.html
> On Apr 26, 2021, at 12:05 PM, Eric Hellman <eric_at_hellman.net> wrote:
>
> Also don't forget that versions of the Dewey Decimal System published in 1925 and earlier are are now in the public domain, for example https://archive.org/details/deweydecimal11dewe (enjoy the spelling!)
>
> Eric
>