Hello Everyone
I am on my library's merit committee and we have been tasked with investigating alternatives to how we do it. Currently, each librarian (we have faculty status) submits an annual report. Everyone is rated on a1-5 scale for 3 parts - Primary duties, scholarship/professional development and service. It is a purely numeric score, no written feedback is given. The library administration also scores each librarian on the same scale. We then get 2 sets of scores in the mail with our annual letter of merit. These annual reports cover Jan to Dec and are used purely for consideration of merit raises. They don't have anything to do with promotion/tenure/renewal files for action.
I'm interested in hearing how other places do it and if you would be willing to share your process - especially how the library administration conducts the merit review.
Thank You
Stacey
Stacey Marien
Acquisitions Librarian
American University
4801 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Library Technical Services
Spring Valley - Room 148
Washington, DC 20016
smarien_at_american.edu<mailto:smarien_at_american.edu>
202-885-3842<tel:202-885-3842>
orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-4559<http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-4559>
Received on Wed Apr 29 2020 - 09:03:16 EDT