ACQflash: Electronic Resources IG at ALA

From: <acqnet-l_at_lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:54:42 -0700
To: ACQNET-L <acqnet-l_at_lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Electronic Resources IG at ALA
From: Amira Aaron <aaaron_at_brandeis.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:42:32 -0400 (EDT)


(Cross-posted ALA announcement)

In a world where funding is decreasing and demand is increasing, 
libraries and librarians are looking for ways to provide access to 
content without submitting their bottom line to costly and sometimes 
little-used online journal subscriptions.

The ALCTS CCS Electronic Resources Interest Group invites you to attend 
its panel discussion "Pay-Per-View Options: Is Transactional Access 
Right For My Institution?" on Saturday, July 11, 2009, from 10:30 
a.m.-12:00 p.m, Chicago Hilton, Continental Ballroom B.

The discussion will center on the experiences of libraries and 
publishers as they implement and manage transactional access models at 
their institutions. The panelists will discuss why transactional access 
was right for their institution, the driving forces behind their 
decisions, the implementation process, technical implementation and 
management of the access, and the outcomes of their endeavors. Following 
the presentations will be a "question and answer" period, as well as an 
open forum for audience members to share their experience(s) with fellow 
session participants.

The panel includes:

Pay Per View – Where We Were, Where We Are and Where Are We Going Next?

Beth R. Bernhardt
Jackson Library
University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Between 2002 and 2003, the University of North Carolina at Greensboro 
(UNCG) set up several different types of pay-per-view options that 
provided users with over 3,500 unsubscribed titles. A few years later 
the library set up access to many of these titles through Consortium Big 
Deals. This presentation will talk about what options the library 
experimented with, what is still there, compare its pay-per-view 
statistics with its big deals and discuss how libraries might use 
pay-per-view options in the coming years.

Developing a Pay-Per-View Model in a Financially Challenging Budget Year

Nicole Mitchell and Elizabeth Lorbeer
Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Anticipated reductions at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, for 
fiscal year 2009/2010 will result in a content budget of roughly half 
what it was four years ago. The library went from having packages with 
almost every commercial and society publisher to just a few packages in 
2009. Over 4,500 titles were cancelled for 2009, with only 52 journals 
being reinstated by user request. In exploring a solution for next 
fiscal year, the library began to investigate investing twenty percent 
of its journal budget to subsidized pay-per-view by setting up deposit 
accounts with the publishers, with a goal to significantly lower user 
fees for article access.

Fast Food Nation/Google Generation/Financial Down Turn…Meet the Library

Ryan Weir and Ashley Ireland
Murray State University
Murray, Kentucky

Murray State University has recently undertaken a project that will be 
the inaugural step in its transition to both providing optimized digital 
access and change of the landscape of its journal acquisitions from a 
model that has been traditionally print to one that is primarily 
electronic. Alongside this transition, the library also added a 
just-in-time element to its previous just-in-case-only model. During 
this presentation, participants will have a window into Murray State's 
experience, including: the driving forces behind its decisions, its 
selection of Science Direct as a vendor, the implementation process, the 
outcomes, and where the library sees itself headed in the future.

Transactional Access: A Publisher's Take

Mark Rothenbuhler
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The final presentation will offer the perspective of a major publisher 
about its experience offering streamlined article access via prepaid 
tokens. Mark Rothenbuhler from Wiley will discuss the realities and 
potential benefits of transactional access to journal articles to 
libraries and publishers, and offer suggestions as to what libraries 
should be thinking about.
--

Jennifer W. Baxmeyer (formerly Jennifer Lang), Chair
ALCTS CCS Electronic Resources Interest Group

PLEASE UPDATE YOUR ADDRESS BOOK WITH MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: bax_at_princeton.edu
Electronic Resources Cataloging Coordinator
Room 2-7-G, Firestone Library
Princeton University
One Washington Road
Princeton NJ 08544-2098
609.258.5476 phone
609.258.0441 fax

and

Amira Aaron, Chair-Elect
ALCTS CCS Electronic Resources Interest Group

Academic Library Consultant
781-248-1806
libconsultaa_at_gmail.com

_______________________________________________
ACQNET-L mailing list
ACQNET-L_at_lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/acqnet-l
Received on Mon Jul 06 2009 - 12:56:45 EDT