Re: The Return of Cards?

From: James Weinheimer <weinheimer.jim.l_at_nyob>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:10:36 +0200
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On 10/5/2013 4:14 AM, Peter Schlumpf wrote:
<snip>
The way I see things going is the total dissociation of data and 
semantics with the medium and whatever technology used to store present 
it, whether it's paper cards or iPads. There will come a time, sooner 
than one may think, when mobile devices will be gone. Even the "cloud" 
will come and go. It doesn't matter. Then there may come a day once 
again when in some cases a paper card catalogue might be a desired 
"format" for this kind of stuff.
</snip>

This may be true since the logical trajectory of the technology is going 
toward a direct connection into your mind, à la the Matrix, 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5b4_5hvOog where someone learns to fly a 
helicopter, or learns Kung-Fu, in just a matter of seconds. All of this 
may be arriving sooner than we think, since there have been two 
experiments, one where a person was able to control the finger of 
another person 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/sciencefair/2013/08/27/human-brain-remote/2709143/, 
and another experiment where a human was able to control the tail of a 
rat 
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/162678-harvard-creates-brain-to-brain-interface-allows-humans-to-control-other-animals-with-thoughts-alone. 
Incredible, and in some ways--in my opinion--absolutely appalling. But 
there is no stopping the trajectory.

I hope that such technological "advances" will find people who are wiser 
than we are to control them. Nonetheless, such advances do seem to lie 
in the fairly remote future and for the moment, we should focus on the 
here and now, and that means mobile devices.

So, concerning Alex's idea of a "human model of understanding" and 
Karen's comment that there is no single model, an example would be the 
idea of a cow. When I think of a cow, I think of steaks with a nice 
glass of red wine, but someone from India would think quite differently. 
I suggest that Google deals with this now by taking your IP address and 
making various assumptions. Google results are quite different if you 
are in the US or Argentina or Norway or Italy but this is mainly with 
languages and advertising. I could see that results would be culturally 
different if searching for "cow" and you were in the US or in India. 
That may happen now, I don't know.

But returning to cards, there does seem to be a fundamental paradox: how 
to place more and more information on smaller and smaller screens? I 
know that the military has done a lot of research into the "heads-up" 
displays of fighter pilots: how much information they can process and 
how quickly they can do it; what information is vital and what can 
safely be ignored, and so on. Perhaps something similar will have to be 
done eventually. Much of what I have seen with APIs and linked data has 
reminded me of adding more and more "stuff" on top of a hamburger 
(pickles and onions and mustard and ketchup ...). At some point, it just 
gets too much, such as what we see on Amazon, but tools could allow (and 
do allow) individuals to decide for themselves what they want on their 
hamburger (card) although that also has its own problems.

-- 
James Weinheimer weinheimer.jim.l_at_gmail.com
First Thus http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/
First Thus Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/FirstThus
Cooperative Cataloging Rules http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/
Cataloging Matters Podcasts http://blog.jweinheimer.net/p/cataloging-matters-podcasts.html
Received on Sat Oct 05 2013 - 07:11:17 EDT