Re: dates

From: john g marr <jmarr_at_nyob>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:24:12 -0600
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
  I thought I mentioned this yesterday, but my post seems to have been 
lost: it should be possible to "tweak" the intent, at least locally, of 
OCLC's field 045 ("Time period of content") to supply the sort of dates 
this thread is discussing. Such a use does not appear to be *proscribed* 
in the field definition.

  John G. Marr
  Cataloger
  CDS, UL
  Univ. of New Mexico
  Albuquerque, NM 87131
  jmarr_at_unm.edu
  jmarr_at_flash.net


     **There are only 2 kinds of thinking: "out of the box" and "outside
the box."

Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
sharing is permitted.
Received on Wed Jul 27 2011 - 14:25:29 EDT