Re: Bill Clinton: Create Internet agency

From: john g marr <jmarr_at_nyob>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:42:56 -0600
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Mon, 23 May 2011, David H. Rothman wrote:

> the truth will generally come out.

  Often not in time to save lives (of various sorts and numbers), due to 
the fact that people can be manipulated and frightened if not educated in 
how to think critically ("information literacy"?).

> carrying ... books debunking Protocols--which is much better than
> ignoring it completely, especially when, yes, it is on the Net (e.g.,
> the version at http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm).

  Perhaps here the librarian-solution to obviating accusations of 
prejudicial information-collecting would be to pop a note in each 
debunking-book with a reference to the Net site.

> And far, far less obnoxious and more credible than a Clinton-style 
> Ministry of Truth (I get full bashing privileges, incidentally--I'm a 
> lifelong Democrat who voted for Bill and Al).

  One would certainly hope that the initiation of discussion of 
controversial ideas containing a diversity of approaches (propriety, need, 
funding, control, "power", future potential misuse, etc.) would not hinder 
the consideration for office of the individuals proposing those ideas, 
particularly when the core concept is "truth" rather than self-interest 
(or so we could insist).

> I can recall talk of "citizen scholars." Yes, that's just the way to 
> think when a patron needs accurate job-related information or is dying 
> of cancer.

  Quite true, and that may be exactly how some patrons are thinking. 
Considering the sad state of the professions these days, and their almost 
exclusive interest in the bottom line, one needs to be able to research 
the nature of ones prospective employers (god forbid the economy has been 
ruined to the extent that everyone is forced to enslave themselves in 
order to eat-- how did that happen?) and ones medical symptoms and 
potential treatments.

  Let's not throw the possibility of developing "citizen scholars" out with 
the possibility that some persons are too desperate (or enslaved) to 
study. Instead, we need to empower as many people as possible to work 
to alleviate the 
desperation.

Cheers!

jgm

  John G. Marr
  Cataloger
  CDS, UL
  Univ. of New Mexico
  Albuquerque, NM 87131
  jmarr_at_unm.edu
  jmarr_at_flash.net


     **There are only 2 kinds of thinking: "out of the box" and "outside
the box."

Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
sharing is permitted.
Received on Mon May 23 2011 - 17:43:19 EDT