Google Instant and BitTorrents

From: James Weinheimer <weinheimer.jim.l_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:34:30 +0200
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
"Google Starts Censoring BitTorrent, RapidShare and More"
http://newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/6830/Google-Starts-Censoring-BitTorrent-RapidShare-and-More.aspx

"A few weeks ago Google announced that it would start filtering "piracy 
related" terms from its 'Autocomplete' and 'Instant' services and today 
they quietly rolled out this questionable feature."
...
"Among the list of forbidden keywords are "uTorrent", a hugely popular 
piece of entirely legal software and "BitTorrent", a file transfer 
protocol and the name of San Fransisco based company BitTorrent Inc. As 
of today, these keywords will no longer be suggested by Google when you 
type in the first letter, nor will they show up in Google Instant. All 
combinations of the word "torrent" are also completely banned."

The article also mentions that autocomplete works for Xunlei, which is 
the major torrent engine in China and a company that Google invested 
money into a few years ago.

Although this does not seem to rank on a par with the "abortion" example 
in Popline from a few years back 
(http://www.librarian.net/stax/2276/librarians-notice-abortion-stop-word-take-action/ 
where they made "abortion" a stopword), Google's action is nevertheless 
a type of censorship. Torrents are not illegal in and of themselves, the 
torrent protocol is simply a type of peer-to-peer technology that uses 
the real power of the internet to transfer information from one computer 
to another.

An excellent article in SearchEngineLand discusses it in far more 
detail, e.g.: 
http://searchengineland.com/how-google-instant-autocomplete-suggestions-work-62592, 
and they mention that the following types of searches are blocked:

    * Hate or violence related suggestions
    * Personally identifiable information in suggestions
    * Porn & adult-content related suggestions
    * Legally mandated removals
    * Piracy-related suggestions

The guidelines describing what is and is not blocked are very detailed, 
e.g. what is a "protected group"? And apparently, it can be spammed (of 
course).

I think these articles discuss some excellent points to keep in mind 
when considering the differences between library-type tools and the 
popular web search engines.

-- 
James L. Weinheimer  weinheimer.jim.l_at_gmail.com
First Thus: http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/
Cooperative Cataloging Rules: http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/""
Received on Tue May 03 2011 - 10:34:53 EDT