Re: our profession's bibliographic information

From: Daniel CannCasciato <Daniel.CannCasciato_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:48:45 -0800
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>> On 12/21/10 at 11:16 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_ND.EDU> wrote in part:
>
> A longer book is not necessarily, but the length of a book (or just about 
> any other bibliographic item) is directly related to the amount of time a 
> person can spend "consuming" it. Length is directly related other expenses a 
> person needs to spend in order to use the item effectively.

Effective is probably subjective as well; I find a "good" index to be directly related to effective use.  I think word count is just word count; people can make of it what they wish.  (Better, or Kakon, or somewhere else on the continuum.)

Daniel



-- 

Daniel CannCasciato
Head of Cataloging
Central Washington University Brooks Library
 
The library:  Not just DVDs and Internet access: We've got magazines and helpful people, too!
Received on Tue Dec 21 2010 - 14:49:28 EST