Re: RDA

From: Laval Hunsucker <amoinsde_at_nyob>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:56:21 -0700
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> . . .  it is RDA: Resource Description & Access.

Thanks :  Right, exactly ;  that's what I thought. 

Then how does the discovery thing creep in -- 
even in respectable contexts ?  ( A Freudian slip, 
perhaps ? )


- Laval Hunsucker
   Breukelen, Nederland




----- Original Message ----
From: Bryan Baldus <bryan.baldus_at_QUALITY-BOOKS.COM>
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Wed, August 18, 2010 8:26:28 PM
Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] RDA

On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 1:01 PM, Laval Hunsucker wrote:
>Probably I've missed something, but :  I've been seeing in quite a few places -- 
>even in official places, even e.g. in an IFLA official place, for example -- the 
>term "Resource Discovery and Access" given as the proper full expression forwhat 
>we call "RDA".

According to <http://www.rdatoolkit.org/>, it is RDA: Resource Description & 
Access.

As for why other places would have "Discovery" instead of "Description", I am 
unable to explain.

I hope this helps,

Bryan Baldus
Cataloger
Quality Books Inc.
The Best of America's Independent Presses
1-800-323-4241x402
bryan.baldus_at_quality-books.com



      
Received on Wed Aug 18 2010 - 15:56:52 EDT