Re: FRBR relationships

From: Ed Jones <ejones_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:40:24 -0700
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
I believe this comes from the museum community. In Cataloging Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images (2006), an example is given of "a portrait of the master of a manor may be linked as a pendant of a matching companion portrait of the mistress of the manor" (p. 22) In this case, the definition of a "pendant" would be "An object, figure, event, etc., that forms a match, parallel, or companion-piece to another; spec. one of a pair of pictures" (Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. "pendant, n.", definition 10.a.)

Ed Jones

-----Original Message-----
From: Next generation catalogs for libraries [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of mahsa fardehoseiny
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 1:03 AM
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [NGC4LIB] FRBR relationships

Dear all

I don't get the concept of "Pendant" in FRBR relationships. As you know
pendant is an example of a work-to- work relationships and also
expression-to- work relationships and expression-to- expression
relationships,

Why is it an *autonomous* work or expression? Please discuss about this with
examples

I'll be grateful if someone could help me

Thanks a lot


-- 
Mahsa Fardehoseiny
Shahid beheshti University, Cataloging department
Tehran, Iran
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 12:41:05 EDT