Re: Copernicus, Cataloging, and the Chairs on the Titanic, Part 1 [Long Post]

From: Ross Singer <rossfsinger_at_nyob>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:18:17 -0400
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Weinheimer Jim <j.weinheimer_at_aur.edu> wrote:

> Perhaps I need to clarify: what I wrote (or at least meant) was that, as the people who make websites learn ever more subtle methods to manipulate Google results to their own advantage--as is happening right now, with entire businesses created for this purpose (see the Google search for Search Engine Optimization http://tinyurl.com/37kfmj6), the searcher for "Caravaggio paintings" will get results that are *increasingly* useless, i.e. search results that actually serve the purposes of *those who wish to manipulate the results* you see vs. what is really and truly relevant for your informational needs.
>

The results are "increasingly useless", as you say, mainly because
libraries, for whatever reason, have completely sat on the sideline
doing nothing with regards to SEO.  This is not to say that we
shouldn't be improving our own services, content and access points,
but we can also be figuring out how to improve our position in the
primary access points of the web.

-Ross.
> While the results in Google may be interesting and useful, we must contrast then with a search on a subject in a library catalog, e.g. browse search for subject "Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da, 1573-1610." http://tinyurl.com/39o77fr
>
> I won't say that one result is necessarily *better* than the other, but each is different and useful. One however, is definitely more "unbiased and ethical" and has the advantage of allowing searchers to not worry about some unscrupulous cataloger trying to get as many dupes as possible out there to open their wallets or to twist people's minds in some way, which happens all the time in Google, although very few people realize it. On the other hand, it has the normal problems of anything created by humans, and of course, it is unrealistic to expect people to do browse searches in this way any longer.
>
> What we are providing is useful and I believe, vital. It doesn't mean the other ways are no good, but somehow we need to figure how to bring out the power of each.
>
> James L. Weinheimer  j.weinheimer_at_aur.edu
> Director of Library and Information Services
> The American University of Rome
> Rome, Italy
>
Received on Fri Jul 09 2010 - 15:19:44 EDT