Re: Copernicus, Cataloging, and the Chairs on the Titanic, Part 2

From: john g marr <jmarr_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:42:44 -0600
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Stephen Paling wrote:

> I feel comfortable saying that I'm past the idealism phase.

  Good for you, personally, but the society that determines the direction 
of the library world (it could be the other way around) is in the midst of 
a significant conflict between idealism and immediate practicality, 
between freedom of information and subjugation of information to economic 
control.

> What specific recommendations do you have?

  We tend to be too specific and miss the "big picture", that libraries 
should collaboratively shift some local funding away from "gatekeeping" of 
local resources to collaborating in the development of non-profit 
completely open-source digital information access systems that complement 
interlinked collections and the Internet rather than competing.

  The library community is unique in its egalitarian responsibility (to 
preserve and enhance open access to all data for the purpose of 
facilitating knowledge development) and in its traditionally 
non-commercial position in society.  Google, for example, is not.

  Any commercialization (competitive for-profit activity) of libraries or 
library systems that operates proprietarily subverts the mission of 
libaries.

  "Show me the money", you might say.  Well, show me the responsibility of 
libraries to become active in effectuating egalitarian government *based 
upon* [not just funding] library activities (data provision and knowledge 
extraction).  Our general passivity and provinciality is presently 
inviable in competition with more aggressive interests.

> Just out of curiosity, what operating system and application suite(-s) 
> do you use? Are they non-commercial?

  We're in the mundane process of spending a lot of time and money trying 
to make proprietary commercial ILSs, etc., work under a Red Hat Linux 
general computing platform.

   What makes it mundane is that it is a local process and that the library 
community is still primarily interested in operating squeaky (proprietary) 
"gates" rather than inventing them.  Who better?

Cheers!

jgm

                                             John G. Marr
                                             Cataloger
                                             CDS, UL
                                             Univ. of New Mexico
                                             Albuquerque, NM 87131
                                             jmarr_at_unm.edu
                                             jmarr_at_flash.net


     **There are only 2 kinds of thinking: "out of the box" and "outside 
the box."

Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
sharing is permitted.
Received on Tue Jun 29 2010 - 13:59:58 EDT