I'm a not-very-frequent poster, but a regular reader of this list. I'll
throw in my two cents about why participation is comparatively low:
Observation 1) A huge majority of the discussions evolve (or perhaps
I should say - devolve) into a whinefest about how bad MARC is. OK,
we get it. MARC isn't a tool for the '10s. What the discussion can't
seem to do is move on. Rather than dwell on the inadequacies of MARC,
why not raise the conversation to one of problem solving? Maybe in
posit some theoretical approaches? When was the last time that someone
compared Primo to its discover layers? Why are Endeca and AquaBrowser
(just to name two) so seldom mentioned?
Observation 2) The discussions and stands are predictable (probably
related to observation 1). I'm pretty sure that I know what Jim or
Karen (or anyone else) is going to say just by reading their name on the
"From" line. Guys, you need to mix it up and surprise the rest of us.
Observation 3) Maybe the "Next Generation Catalog" bus already left the
station, and no one here noticed it because we were all discussing MARC
records....
Ted
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized use, copying, disclosure, or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the sender and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail.
Received on Mon Jun 28 2010 - 17:46:47 EDT