On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Weinheimer Jim <j.weinheimer_at_aur.edu> wrote:
> Another possibility, and possibly more understandable since it avoids all the FRBR concepts, would be to use the current BIBCO standards http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/bibco/core2002.html and translate these into everyday language, eliminating some of the more bizarre fields, e.g. the fixed fields.
>
Noooo! The fixed fields are some of the only data we can consistently
read with machines!
-Ross.
Received on Fri Jun 25 2010 - 21:43:45 EDT