Re: Are MARC subfields really useful ?

From: Karen Coyle <lists_at_nyob>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:06:39 -0700
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Quoting john g marr <jmarr_at_UNM.EDU>:

>   That may be the wrong question.  Try this: why can't format
> developers be encouraged to start with what already works and make
> modifications, instead of reinventing way too many wheels that are not
> interoperable? Did they all start life in the auto industry??   :)

When MARC was developed, there was nothing anywhere near it that  
already worked. Nothing. In 1965 (which is not before MY time :-))  
data was
   - all upper case
   - all of fixed length, and very short fixed lengths at that
   - ASCII only

MARC was a game-changer, and it is unfortunate that it was only used  
in libraries. Variable length fields, upper and lower case plus  
accents, and what seemed like an endless expandability. That it has  
lasted more than 40 years is a tribute to its design. Few data formats  
are used and usable for that length of time. It was absolutely genius  
in its day; but the world has changed in ways that could not have been  
anticipated at that time.

kc

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Mon Jun 07 2010 - 13:08:09 EDT