Re: Are MARC subfields really useful ?

From: john g marr <jmarr_at_nyob>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:52:08 -0600
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Gray-Williams, Donna wrote:

> Why can't MARC be expanded to function like these other formats if the 
> data isn't presented in a ideal way to be extracted?  Why does it have 
> to be totally thrown out to adopt something completely different? Is 
> that so impossible?

   That may be the wrong question.  Try this: why can't format developers 
be encouraged to start with what already works and make modifications, 
instead of reinventing way too many wheels that are not interoperable? 
Did they all start life in the auto industry??   :)

jgm

                                             John G. Marr
                                             Cataloger
                                             CDS, UL
                                             Univ. of New Mexico
                                             Albuquerque, NM 87131
                                             jmarr_at_unm.edu
                                             jmarr_at_flash.net


     **There are only 2 kinds of thinking: "out of the box" and "outside 
the box."

Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
sharing is permitted.
Received on Mon Jun 07 2010 - 12:53:22 EDT