Re: OCLC and Michigan State at Impasse Over SkyRiver Cataloging, Resource Sharing Costs

From: Ross Singer <rossfsinger_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:40:11 -0500
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan_at_nd.edu> wrote:
> I beg to differ; it is trivial to dump and expose one's bibliographic records to the Web.
>
> Any ILS worth its weight in salt has an export function.

I think you may be surprised that this is not a universal truth.
*Many* ILSes have an export function, some are premium features.

I have no idea whether or not hosted ILSes (or which hosted ILSes)
have this option (especially for free).

And I'm still not sure I see where the value lies in all libraries
exporting their data.  Won't there be extremely high percentage of
overlap for all but a small minority of libraries (which is where the
really interesting data would be)?


David brings up a valid point, as well.  Taking the LC records dump in
the Internet Archive as an example.

1) This is a snapshot from 2007
2) It's only book records
3) This is now out of date.

So merely exporting our records isn't enough.  How do we deal with the
deltas?  Does every library have to deal with the deltas?

-Ross.
Received on Tue Mar 09 2010 - 12:40:37 EST