Hi, folks.
If you'll permit me to return for a moment to the
discussion-topic which ran for a while on this list
a couple of weeks back and which some of you
presumably found to be of some interest -- on the
question of what a "document" is, or what should
be considered as such :
In going through some of my old digital records for
purposes of housekeeping today, I came across an
old reference to something I'd since forgotten about
but which is very relevant to the matter. It was a
project ( "un travail collectif de réflexion" ) carried
out at the CNRS (Centre national de la recherche
scientifique).
The point was as follows : "Il se propose de préciser
la notion de document dans son passage au numérique
à partir de recherches qui privilégient plutôt la forme
(comme un objet matériel ou immatériel), le signe
(comme un porteur de sens) ou la relation (comme un
vecteur de communication).". You'll find a very
interesting paper on this by Roger Pédauque, dating
from 2003, at
http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/21/68/HTML/index.html
under the title "Document : forme, signe et relation,
les re-formulations du numérique", with a somewhat
later version in the Archive Ouverte en Sciences de
l'Information et de la Communication at
http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/21/99/PDF/sic_00000511.pdf.
See also the piece by Jean-Michel Salaün at
http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/06/23/26/HTML/index.html
Just thought I'd mention this, for anyone who may
be inclined to pursue the matter.
- Laval Hunsucker
Breukelen, Nederland
Received on Fri Feb 05 2010 - 08:25:56 EST