On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Alexander Johannesen <
alexander.johannesen_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your understanding of the fragment identifier is deeply flawed, I'm afraid.
> Of *course* the fragment should be considered by the server; that's the
> point. The server then decides what to do with the extra identifier, and in
> the case of HTML it does nothing different, but in the case of XML and RDF
> (and friends) they are *different* resources.
>
> A quick start;
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier
>
Not a normative reference, but correct when it states that "The fragment
identifier functions differently than the rest of the URI: namely, its
processing is exclusively
client-side<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Client_%28computing%29>with
no participation from the
server <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_server>."
Received on Thu Nov 12 2009 - 17:18:10 EST