On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Karen Coyle <lists_at_kcoyle.net> wrote:
> What adds to the confusion is that page doesn't have anything about those
> schemes, but I can understand it as a logical anchor when no other
> documentation is available. It's going to be tough, however, should they
> develop documentation for the schemes, because these identifiers already
> exist. What does one do then?
Well, it does -- they're just suppressed from display by css. There
is information available about those schemes in the RDF, as well (and,
certainly, more could be added).
That's what is sort of cool about RDF: RDFa is no less legitimate a
serialization than RDF/XML, N3, Turtle or n-triples. So, LC doesn't
really have to do /anything/ different than they currently are and can
provide both HTML and RDF from those URIs.
-Ross.
>
> kc
>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
>
Received on Wed Nov 11 2009 - 21:35:47 EST