Re: Why don't non-librarians value library data as highly as we do?

From: Karen Coyle <lists_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:59:52 -0700
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Quoting Weinheimer Jim <j.weinheimer_at_aur.edu>:


> You are right about the LCSH terms, but at least some include the   
> subdivisions. Here is an example taken at random:
> "Graphic Artists Guild handbook : pricing & ethical guidelines."
> http://books.google.com/books?id=doHyI6ami8MC&dq=%22motion+pictures%22&lr=&ei=kyyySsGFMInOzQSvk6iVAw

Jim, note that this is not a record that Google scanned from a library  
-- it's from one of its publisher partners. Any books currently in  
print that you find in Google books are there because of a contract  
between Google and the publisher. I would love to know where Google  
got all of its data from, but as you know many publishers are  
providing MARC data along with their books, so the LC subject headings  
may have come along with the publisher data. Ironically, in that case,  
the data is probably not controlled by the OCLC policy (either the old  
nor the new that was withdrawn).

kc
-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thu Sep 17 2009 - 10:01:34 EDT