I totally do not buy that all "bibliographic datasets" are pretty much
the same regardless of schema, format, or rules they are produced in.
I asked, because if your data HAD been AACR2-MARC, I think your chances
of creating something as useful as you had would have been lower. I am
not surprised to find out it is not.
Jonathan
Thomas Krichel wrote:
> Jonathan Rochkind writes
>
>
>> Is it in AACR2/MARC, or what? Very curious.
>>
>
> No, because it is mainly dealing with journal articles
> and working papers. But is just a bibliographic dataset,
> therefore in it's nature similar to an AARC/MARC dataset.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
> skype: thomaskrichel
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 16 2009 - 13:37:18 EDT