Another minimum:
780 (preceding title)
785 (succeeding title)
I'm actively running into this (wondering how to get preceding/succeeding titles to display within a search for any given periodical title) right now... (as well as the alternate titles metadata)
-Aaron
:-)'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
> [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] An article to warm the hearts of cataloguers
>
> > To answer Karen's most recent post, Google can use any WC metadata
> > field. And it's important to note as well that our agreement with
> > Google is not exclusive. We're happy to work with others in the
> > same way. The goal, as I said in my original post, is to support
> > the efforts of our members to bring their collections online, make
> > them discoverable, and drive traffic to library services.
> >
>
> That's great. (I'm assuming Chip's answer of "field" means "field and
> subfield." So now we need to be talking to Google about what fields we
> want to see in GBS that will make it easier to combine GBS with
> library services. We could go the route of saying: "Keep the whole
> MARC record," but it would probably be best to come up with a minimum
> and let Google decide if it wants to include more.
>
> At the very least, it seems to me that the functionality that we need
> has to do with "headings" -- that is, that we would want to be able to
> connect names and subjects in library catalogs to books in GBS, so
> that we could create metasearches. Ideally, names should be
> identified, where possible, with LCNA record IDs. I also think that we
> want all of the possible identifiers: ISBN (which Google keeps now),
> LCCN, OCLC number. Others?
>
> kc
Received on Thu Sep 10 2009 - 16:55:44 EDT