Re: ISBNs as publisher identifiers

From: Ed Jones <ejones_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:54:06 -0700
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Bear in mind that when one publisher acquires another, the acquiring
publisher can continue to use the ISBNs of the acquired publisher.  So
the ISBN prefix of Publisher A may appear on publications bearing the
imprint of Publisher B.  Cf. ISBN User's Manual. 5th ed. (Berlin:
International ISBN Agency, 2005), 5.10.
http://www.isbn-international.org/en/download/2005%20ISBN%20Users%27%20M
anual%20International%20Edition.pdf

Ed Jones
National University (San Diego, Calif.) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
[mailto:NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 6:17 AM
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [NGC4LIB] ISBNs as publisher identifiers

You probably know that there is a part of the ISBN that identifies the 
publisher. Edward Betts of the Open Library did a run through the OL 
database and matched up the variant forms of publisher names based on 
the ISBN in the record. His blog post
   http://blog.openlibrary.org/2009/07/20/isbn-publisher-codes/
links to the full file for downloading with counts for each publisher.

In the file http://home.us.archive.org/~edward/isbn/index.html, if you 
click on an individual publisher, you see all the various publisher 
names and the dates in which they are used (which sometimes doesn't mean

anything, but at other times shows publisher name changes), something
like:

0-06:   41084: (1073-1997) Harper & Row
 15191: (1953-2010) HarperCollins
  6351: (   1-2009) HarperCollins Publishers
  5122: (1921-2007) HarperSanFrancisco
  3550: (1933-2009) HarperPerennial
  2704: (1970-2009) HarperCollinsPublishers
  2121: (1947-1988) Barnes & Noble Books
  1908: (1993-2009) William Morrow
  1642: (1900-2004) Perennial Library
  1599: (1952-1988) Barnes & Noble

It seems to me that this would be a good start for 1) creating an 
identifier for publishers (http://blahblah/0-06), and 2) a beginning of 
an authority record with all forms of the name.

Yes, there are errors (as you can see above), so there would need to be 
some cleanup, but I'm excited to be able to even think about having a 
publisher "entity" and not just a string in our data.

kc

-- 
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596   skype: kcoylenet
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------
Received on Tue Jul 21 2009 - 10:56:10 EDT