Stephens, Owen wrote:
> This is true - but if only we recorded even summary holdings statements for print journals in a machine parsable format it would be a real step forward - we could then answer the same question for print holding as Link servers tend to for electronic holdings.
Right, and that's what we've got in our national periodicals database.
I was thinking CONSER might have the equivalent. At least, MARC holdings
format does make provisions for that.
B.Eversberg
Received on Thu Mar 19 2009 - 10:25:16 EDT