Re: Whose elephant is it, anyway? (the OLE project)

From: Till Kinstler <kinstler_at_nyob>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:30:24 +0100
To: NGC4LIB_at_LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Bernhard Eversberg schrieb:

> That's good news, and it doesn't look too bad.
> Was it made part of the standard then? If no, why not?
> Where can I read about SOLR's browse support functions?

In the source code, SCNR.
Solr isn't about library data or any other special kind of data. It is a 
very flexible text/string indexing and retrieval system. You may index 
any string in very flexible ways, e.g. even so you can search it 
efficently as "left anchored text field". Things like the powerful 
facetting functions help to get the data efficently out of those index 
fields.
But there is no bullet on the feature list "left anchored text fields", 
because that is not a concept in Solr, the index concept of Solr is more 
flexible and you need to adjust it to your needs to get a field that 
supports such features the best way. That's what makes Solr so powerful.

> Is there also name, title, and keyword browsing? I mean, true browsing,
> up and down, a sorted list of titles, names, or keywords. 

You may sort any search result (and a browse list is a search result) 
many different ways. And if you have sorted your list, you may of course 
step up and down the list.
But you must add a front end to Solr that prvides all this flexible 
functionality in a sensible way to the user.

Regards,
Till

-- 
Till Kinstler
Verbundzentrale des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (VZG)
Platz der Göttinger Sieben 1, D 37073 Göttingen
kinstler@gbv.de, +49 (0) 551 39-13431, http://www.gbv.de
Received on Thu Mar 12 2009 - 04:33:35 EDT