> That's how FRBR defines Work. OCLC is actually usually working at the
> Expression level, due to lack of info in the records.
Oh, yes, you're right. We don't have a manifestation layer.
> In the UC union catalog, we had about 35 million 'books', and 10 million
> *titles* (edited in from last message). However, 66% of the works were singletons. So we had about 6.5
> million singletons, and the other 29 million books turned into the 3.5
> million merged titles.
Interesting, though as it's titles not works, hard to compare. What is
the real definition of "titles" anyway? ISBN and if not ISBN, then
title string plus author string?
Tim
Received on Mon Feb 16 2009 - 12:16:23 EST