CPSO report:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/pre_vs_post.pdf
And the LC response to the WoGroFuBibCo is NOT linked from the working
group's page, so if you missed it, it's
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/LCWGRptResponse_DM_053008.pdf
kc
Janet Hill wrote:
> Also read the LC CPSO report on pre-coordinated vs. post-coordinated
> headings (and much more), issued sometime between the publication of the LC
> Working Group draft and the final report, and then trace those
> recommendations back to the Airlie House report from 1991.
>
> Many of LC's responses to the WG report (in the area of subject access) were
> in the form of "we are committed to implementing the recommendations of
> CPSO". And many of the recommendations in the CPSO report echoed
> recommendations from Airlie House.
>
> (The mills of the gods grind BOTH exceeding fine and exceeding slow)
>
>
> Janet Swan Hill, Professor
> Associate Director for Technical Services
> University of Colorado Libraries, CB184
> Boulder, CO 80309
> janet.hill_at_colorado.edu
> *****
> Tradition is the handing-on of Fire, and not the worship of Ashes.
> - Gustav Mahler
>
>
>
--
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------
Received on Wed Jun 25 2008 - 10:06:10 EDT