I'm curious. Is this the only benefit to being in the consortium?
-Ross.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:09 PM, John Rutherford <aw8721_at_wayne.edu> wrote:
> A number of years ago there was discussion about whether or not z39.50
> access to
> records was allowed when the source was OCLC, with OCLC maintaining that
> they
> held some rights to the records when they were downloaded by customers
> into local
> ILS's and then made available for z39.50 access.
>
> Is this still an issue? I don't ever recall hearing anything definitive
> on this (but then again
> there is rarely anything definitive with the law)
>
> John Rutherford
> Wayne State
>
>
>
> Tim Spalding wrote:
> > Does your administration feel that cutting the others off will spur
> > them to start paying and thereby reduce your costs? "Economic
> > feasability" doesn't enter into it otherwise, since the marginal cost
> > of distributing the records is zero.
> >
> > It's seems like a variant on the Prisoner's Dilemma in which your
> > non-cooperation never helps you, but it can be a messaging system to
> > force others to cooperate.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Nicholas Bennyhoff
> > <nicholasbennyhoff_at_mailman.lcls.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I have a question about Z39.50 record downloading.
> >>
> >> Our library system recently made the decision to close down Z39.50 access to our MARC records from our catalog. The primary reason being that in our system, about half the libraries are a part of the ILS system, and pay for our cataloging costs through the payment of their consortium fees. There are other libraries in our system, which are not part of the automated consortium, who would like access to our MARC records via Z39.50, but as they do not pay the consortium fees, we felt we needed to protect those records for the members of the ILS consortium.
> >>
> >> Since shutting down the Z39.50 access, we've had inquiries from 2 libraries - 1 out-of-state, and 1 in our system (but not part of the ILS)- about no longer being able to download our records.
> >>
> >> In theory, I'm absolutely in favor of allowing the access to our records, but I understand that the system feels that it is not economically feasible to share the records.
> >>
> >> I know this issue has been discussed before, but I'd be interested in others' perspectives on the economic issues surrounding Z39.50 access.
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> Nicholas T. Bennyhoff
> >> CMC Cataloger
> >> Lewis and Clark Library System
> >> 2765 Goshen Rd.
> >> Edwardsville, IL 62025
> >> (618)656-3216 ext.107
> >> nicholasbennyhoff_at_lcls.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________________________________________
> >> Sent via the WebMail system at mailman.lcls.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Check out my library at http://www.librarything.com/profile/timspalding
> >
>
Received on Fri Mar 28 2008 - 13:34:47 EDT