Hmmm. Read the post. Isn't the point to no longer "ILS", that is to no
longer have a single, integrated system? This post seems to be
suggesting that we add APIs to our ILSs for the creation of "discovery
systems" as if the ILSs are just fine for everything else. I don't think
that's the case. If we are separating the discovery function from the
rest of the library management functions, then we need to go back and
analyze the whole workflow, from purchase, account management, check in
of serials, circulation, bindery .... Right now our data is designed to
move through the flow and end up in the catalog. If discovery is
happening through a non-integrated interface, I think the whole data
flow comes under question.
kc
Patricia Martin wrote:
> http://everybodyslibraries.com/2008/02/01/blowing-the-lid-off-the-ils-an
> d-the-providers-chance-to-have-a-say/
>
> this reminds me of "what if we gave a war and nobody came".... how do we
> get vendors interested in supporting standards? what works or doesn't
> work to pique their interest?
>
> any comments or suggestions on this?
>
>
--
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------
Received on Fri Feb 01 2008 - 19:43:35 EST