Re: pandora [privacy]

From: Leibowitz, Faye R <frleibo_at_nyob>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:16:57 -0500
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
Should confidentiality/privacy continue to be listed as a core value of librarianship?

 http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/corevaluesstatement/corevalues.htm#privacy

Faye Leibowitz
General Languages Team Leader
Catalog Management Unit
University Library System
University of Pittsburgh
frleibo_at_pitt.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Next generation catalogs for libraries [mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Harris
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 12:55 PM
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] pandora [privacy]

I know the problems of privacy could be largely resolved by data separation or delinking as some have said, but I come down on the side of "it's my data and I can do what I want with it."  Totally purging usage data means a patron will never be able to go back and see what they used, searches they did, results retrieved, items downloaded.  As a library patron, those are all things I wish I had.  Some of our systems accommodate that and some don't.  Even if it meant syphoning data from one source to use in a separate platform, I think it's worth looking at.


Steven R. Harris
Collection Development Librarian
Utah State University
(435) 797-3861
http://collections2point0.wordpress.com/
Received on Mon Jan 28 2008 - 13:14:43 EST