On Jan 6, 2008 10:37 AM, B.G. Sloan <bgsloan2_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm not defending Google, or saying it's better than library catalogs, etc. I'm just saying that it's unfair to misrepresent Google the way that Jim did.
Google does a bit better with a search for "cats" instead of "cat", too.
If someone came to the reference desk and said, "I'd like to learn
about cat", what would be your first thought?
--
Jason Etheridge
| VP, Community Support and Advocacy
| Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts
| phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: jason_at_esilibrary.com
| web: http://www.esilibrary.com
Received on Sun Jan 06 2008 - 14:03:52 EST