Ross Singer wrote:
>
> Since that's what we're really talking about -- it's relevance ranking
> of the metadata about items, not relevance ranking the items
> themselves and I think we need to realize that reality in how we model
> and generate our metadata accordingly.
>
That's what I'm really getting at: it's what _we_ are talking about,
and I'm not at all sure that it also is what users expect when
they read "relevance".
But as Humpty-Dumpty went on,
"The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all."
B.E.
Received on Fri Dec 21 2007 - 10:17:29 EST