When my systems folks replaced my computer yesterday, they made a typo in my
e-mail address (colordo instead of colorado), so I believe that the message
below was rejected by the ListServ software. I'm trying again.
jsh
-----Original Message-----
From: Janet Hill-Swan [mailto:janet.hill_at_colordo.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:47 AM
To: 'Next generation catalogs for libraries'
Subject: RE: [NGC4LIB] relationships
I saw the smiley, but even so, let me repeat something that I believe I
posted this here before. Here's the gist of it:
Members of the LC Working Group are monitoring many lists and blogs for
reactions to the report. BUT, there is no guarantee that a message that you
put on your blog, or put on a list will be picked up or attended to.
Especially if something you say is imbedded in another message, it may get
missed.
If you care enough about your opinion, then please take a few moments and
reformulate what you may have already posted somewhere else, and submit it
through the one avenue that is guaranteed to be effective -- the Working
Group Website
If you don't think it's worth the effort, then the Working Group can be
forgiven for thinking likewise.
jsh
Janet Swan Hill, Professor
Associate Director for Technical Services
University of Colorado Libraries, CB184
Boulder, CO 80309
janet.hill_at_colorado.edu
*****
Tradition is the handing-on of Fire, and not the worship of Ashes.
- Gustav Mahler
-----Original Message-----
From: Next generation catalogs for libraries
[mailto:NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Tim Spalding
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:26 PM
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
Subject: Re: [NGC4LIB] relationships
What if we suggest on the LC site that they look outside the LC site? :)
Just posted on open data and the report, here:
http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2007/12/open-data-and-future-of-bibli
ographic.php
T
Received on Wed Dec 12 2007 - 18:50:54 EST