On 10 Dec 2007, at 17:39, Martha Yee wrote:
> So my question
> to you all is: what are the implications of reusing the FRBR
> work/expression/manifestation entity definitions? Would that not
> imply
> reusing the entity mapping of bibliographic elements that are part
> of the
> FRBR RDF expression?
The FRBR ontology at http://vocab.org/frbr/core was not produced by
the same people that produced the FRBR model and marc mappings. So
not necessarily. The FRBR ontology really maps to the FRBR
specification, so if you agree with the basic definition of the four
WEMI classes then you should ideally use the existing work to markup
your data.
rob
Received on Tue Dec 11 2007 - 05:25:49 EST