Re: Martha Yee's cataloging rules for a

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle_at_nyob>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:36:47 -0800
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Karen Coyle wrote:
>> A is a performance of Z
>> C is an arrangement of Z
>> F is a performance of C
>>
>
> In the above list, A is an expression. Z is a work. C is an expression.
> F is also an expression. Expression F may be related to Expression C
> with a "is a performance of" relationships----that relationship may or
> may not be in FRBR right now, but should be!
>

But if "A is a performance of Z" means that Z is a work, doesn't "F is a
performance of C" mean that C could also be a work? As some of our
music-enabled colleagues replied, by some definitions, an arrangement is
a separate work. Could C be simultaneously an expression and a work?

I don't know the answers, but I think we need to explore this further
before we declare that we have four possible boxes (WEMI) and that
everything fits neatly into one or the other. That's why I think it is
more important to state that C is an arrangement of Z than to say what
box it fits into. It can remain an arrangement of Z and find itself in
different boxes based on different contexts or functions.

kc

--
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596   skype: kcoylenet
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------
Received on Wed Dec 05 2007 - 17:37:51 EST