Re: FRBR and film & video

From: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen_at_nyob>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:59:59 +1000
To: NGC4LIB_at_listserv.nd.edu
On 9/10/07, McGrath, Kelley C. <kmcgrath_at_bsu.edu> wrote:
> Should we take the original date from the
> package (where it may vary from publisher to publisher), from IMDB, from
> AMG, or from some other source (and these sources often vary by a year;
> occasionally I have even seen three different years listed).

Yes. To all of them. :)

> And is the
> original date the date of theatrical release or the date production
> finished?

It depends. But I'm sure that "around 1985" is what they're looking
for, whether they mean theatrical release or production end or
contract sign-off or whatever else. If they can get somehow to the
item in question and that item has a slew of rich meta data, I doubt
any of these concerns are real. But that's just a guess. Anyone got a
whole FRBR model going? I know our http://ll01.nla.gov.au/ has an
experimental but limited FRBR model attached, but has anyone attempted
the whole shebang, and lived to tell the tale?


Alex
--
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------
Received on Tue Sep 11 2007 - 01:09:41 EDT